Re: Bitcoin

There are a lot of things you can say on the sourceforge site that I can’t say on my own site. Even so, I’m uncomfortable with explicitly saying “consider it an investment”. That’s a dangerous thing to say and you should delete that bullet point. It’s OK if they come to that conclusion on their own, but we can’t pitch it as that.

A few details: the FAQ says “see section 2.3”, but the sections aren’t numbered. Also, could you delete the last sentence on the FAQ “They are planned to be hidden in v0.1.6, since they’re just confusing and annoying and there’s no reason for users to have to see them.” — that’s not really something I meant to say publicly.

I made the changes. You could also register to the site or use the
admin account to make necessary changes yourself, since the pages are
located in the wiki.

Someone came up with the word “cryptocurrency”… maybe it’s a word we should use when describing Bitcoin, do you like it?

It sounds good. “The P2P Cryptocurrency” could be considered as the
slogan, even if it’s a bit more difficult to say than “The Digital P2P
Cash”. It still describes the system better and sounds more
interesting, I think.

I could notify the mailing list about the new site and invite them to
write on the forums and to the wiki.

Source: Published by Martti Malmi on GitHub in February 2024 as part of his testimony in the COPA v. Wright trial. The full correspondence archive is available at mmalmi.github.io/satoshi/.